You can bet your next paycheck that another attack is imminent. Its coming, and its very near.
Just take a look at 2009....6 attempted attacks and one succesful attack causing the death of 13 and injuring 22. And we are so complacent about it.
When will our leaders wake up and do their damn jobs and follow the Constitution. That is to maintain the safety and security of the American people.
I gave Obama a lot of space, but my patience is wearing thin. Elections in 2010 are going to be interesting.
Another thing I don't understand, is the news media and the American people themselves. Do they not see anything going on?
Look at decades ago....you never or seldom heard of radicalize Islam terror attacks.
NOW...a day doesn't go by when its mentioned in the media. You see it on the news "crawl" at the bottom of the television screen. Everyday! Every damn day!!
Whenever there is an attack or attempted terror attack, our leaders set up new rules or new regulations. How about being a little pro-active for a change?
Start getting the CIA and the FBI and the Homeland Security working in tandem. Start sharing information.
Review and renew the Patriot Act...NOW!!
Maintain Gitmo, keep it open. Send all islamic terrorist there and hold them forever. When word gets around that if you get caught, your jailed for life. They do not get the protection of the US Constitution.
Stop muslim immigration. Immediately.
Allow the FBI to do its job!! Servailance on Islamic mosques is imperative.
Wherever you go...keep your eyes and ears open. My daughter just flew back to Denver and she profiled the people in the airport. She sat next to a man, she thought might be Middle-Eastern and she kept her eyes on him. This is what everybody has to do.
Most Americans do not realize...that if they report suspicious activity...they are immune from any law suit that may be brought from the accused. They will not be sued!! This is a fact, its the LAW!
We are at war.
Americans are afraid to cause a stir. They are afraid they may offend someone. We are so politcally correct, we are putting our lives in danger. Americans don't want to grasp the thought, that there are thugs out there, that want to kill us!! They want us dead. They want our children dead. Islamic militants hate us and everything we stand for. For whatever reason extremist feel they are fighting for, they want us dead.
Islam is to be the dominate religion in America.
Israel is to leave Palestine.
America will have Shariah Law.
Whatever the reason. They are here, and it only takes a few.
In the coming months, something is going to change with our governemnt. Either they are going to get wise to Islamic radicals and start doing what we elected them to do and that is to keep us safe.Or they simply will give up, apologize and let the Islamist run amok in our country. Already we see more and more radicals standing and preaching on street corners, promoting the over throw of the government and the implementation of Shariah Law.
The only thing keeping them at bay right now is FOX News and the internet.
So there will be more attacks. And if the Obama administration keeps its eyes and ears closed, we are all doomed.
What will it take? A downed airliner? Or something a little more deadly?
Maybe a school takeover?
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Monday, December 28, 2009
As-Sabiqun
"As-Sabiqun is an Islamic movement that believes in the Islamic State of North America no later than 2050. Those who engage in this great effort require a high level of commitment and determination. We are sending out a call to the believers: Join with us in this great struggle to change the world!"
-Imam Musa, the Washington, DC, imam who supports jihad terror and Islamic supremacism.
I believe Abu Bakr Ba'shir puts the situation in the easiest to understand light for us Kuffar: "The path taken by many political parties in their effort to establish an Islamic regime is not the right path, because these parties adopt democracy. Democracy is not an Islamic means. Democracy runs counter to Islam, because it emphasizes the sovereignty of the people, whereas Islam emphasizes the sovereignty of Allah.
Thus, if we are to submit to the law of Allah, Muslims have no choice but to say: 'We hear and obey.' In democracy, Allah's commands may be open to discussion, and if we agree with them, we accept them, but if we do not agree with them, we reject them. Herein lies the flaw. Therefore, as long as the Islamic political parties endeavor to adhere to Islam by means of democracy, they will not achieve their goal
"It is a duty… We are duty-bound to establish an Islamic state, and the Muslims are duty-bound to live in an Islamic country. Muslims are forbidden to live in an infidel country. Sheik Fawzan Al-Fawzan issued a fatwa forbidding Muslims to live in the countries of the infidels. That is why we are committed to establishing an Islamic state.
The path that the Prophet Muhammad bid us to take is the path of preaching and Jihad. Waging Jihad is the proper conduct. That is why it is essential to establish an Islamic state by means of preaching and Jihad. We have tried to do this in Indonesia, by committing ourselves to Islamic preaching."
Islam by its very existence us sedition. Mr. Bakr Ba’shir understands the Koran well, and bases his assessment on his perfect understanding of the Islamic imperative. We would do well to listen to him, and heed his words.
I like our country the way it is.
There are already too many "Islamic" states in the world, but I'm sure that one of them will allow you to immigrate to it.
Think of it! Sharia law is already imposed. Women are property. You can own slaves. Dhimmis have been subdued (or killed). Everybody knows (or is afraid to admit otherwise) that the Qur'an is the perfect book. All the other books are burned. Imagination is dead. Women are "dressed" in cloth Hefty bags.
This is as close to Paradise that a Muslim can get! Why live in the decadent West? Get yourself back to your posse! You'll feel so much better.
Frankly, so will we.
-Imam Musa, the Washington, DC, imam who supports jihad terror and Islamic supremacism.
I believe Abu Bakr Ba'shir puts the situation in the easiest to understand light for us Kuffar: "The path taken by many political parties in their effort to establish an Islamic regime is not the right path, because these parties adopt democracy. Democracy is not an Islamic means. Democracy runs counter to Islam, because it emphasizes the sovereignty of the people, whereas Islam emphasizes the sovereignty of Allah.
Thus, if we are to submit to the law of Allah, Muslims have no choice but to say: 'We hear and obey.' In democracy, Allah's commands may be open to discussion, and if we agree with them, we accept them, but if we do not agree with them, we reject them. Herein lies the flaw. Therefore, as long as the Islamic political parties endeavor to adhere to Islam by means of democracy, they will not achieve their goal
"It is a duty… We are duty-bound to establish an Islamic state, and the Muslims are duty-bound to live in an Islamic country. Muslims are forbidden to live in an infidel country. Sheik Fawzan Al-Fawzan issued a fatwa forbidding Muslims to live in the countries of the infidels. That is why we are committed to establishing an Islamic state.
The path that the Prophet Muhammad bid us to take is the path of preaching and Jihad. Waging Jihad is the proper conduct. That is why it is essential to establish an Islamic state by means of preaching and Jihad. We have tried to do this in Indonesia, by committing ourselves to Islamic preaching."
Islam by its very existence us sedition. Mr. Bakr Ba’shir understands the Koran well, and bases his assessment on his perfect understanding of the Islamic imperative. We would do well to listen to him, and heed his words.
I like our country the way it is.
There are already too many "Islamic" states in the world, but I'm sure that one of them will allow you to immigrate to it.
Think of it! Sharia law is already imposed. Women are property. You can own slaves. Dhimmis have been subdued (or killed). Everybody knows (or is afraid to admit otherwise) that the Qur'an is the perfect book. All the other books are burned. Imagination is dead. Women are "dressed" in cloth Hefty bags.
This is as close to Paradise that a Muslim can get! Why live in the decadent West? Get yourself back to your posse! You'll feel so much better.
Frankly, so will we.
Mohammed
Mohammed entered his classroom on the first day of school.
"What is your name?" asked the teacher.
"Mohammed". . .. answered the kid.
"You are in America now. From now on your name will be Johnny," replied the teacher.
In the evening, Mohammed returned home. "How was your day, Mohammed?" asked his mother.
"My name is not Mohammed. Im in America and now my name is Johnny."
"Ah, are you ashamed of your name, are you trying to dishonor your parents, your heritage, your religion? Shame on you!" and she beat him.
Then she called his father and he too beat him.
The next day Mohammed returned to school.
When the teacher saw him with all the bruises she asked, "What happened to you little Johnny"?
"Well ma'am, 20 hours after becoming an American,
I was attacked by two friggin Arabs."
"What is your name?" asked the teacher.
"Mohammed". . .. answered the kid.
"You are in America now. From now on your name will be Johnny," replied the teacher.
In the evening, Mohammed returned home. "How was your day, Mohammed?" asked his mother.
"My name is not Mohammed. Im in America and now my name is Johnny."
"Ah, are you ashamed of your name, are you trying to dishonor your parents, your heritage, your religion? Shame on you!" and she beat him.
Then she called his father and he too beat him.
The next day Mohammed returned to school.
When the teacher saw him with all the bruises she asked, "What happened to you little Johnny"?
"Well ma'am, 20 hours after becoming an American,
I was attacked by two friggin Arabs."
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Fort Hood Denial – by Jamie Glazov
As the United States prepares to try Nidal Malik Hasan for 13 counts of murder and 32 counts of attempted murder at Fort Hood last month, few question the suspect’s guilt, but many disagree about his motives.
Yet the evidence is now conclusive: the Fort Hood massacre was an act of Islamic terror. Before his shooting spree, Hasan told colleagues that non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell and that they should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats.
Hasan traded 18 e-mails with Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaida recruiter. On the morning of the massacre, he gave his neighbor a Koran as he was departing for the base, telling her that he was going to do “good work for God.” Wearing Pakistani garb, Hasan shouted “Allahu akbar” as he began firing at U.S. troops.
Despite the plentiful evidence, however, leftists refuse to accept Hasan’s Islamic inspiration.
We’ve heard the rationalizations: Hasan was a nut; the stresses of serving in the military drove him crazy; he experienced anti-Islamic discrimination; anyone is capable of “losing it” under such stressful conditions; and so on.
These reflexive denials are a logical continuation of the Left’s long tradition of denying the evil of our totalitarian enemies—or, when forced to acknowledge them, blaming them on the United States. This was the pattern throughout the Cold War, and it’s continued during the War on Terror.
When it’s proven beyond reasonable doubt that jihadism was in fact Hasan’s motive, here’s a prediction: leftists will either fall into apathetic silence or respond that it was American racism, oppression, and Islamophobia that forced Hasan’s hand.
To recognize the evil of Nidal Hasan and his ideology, to admit the existence of pernicious enemies, is to concede that there are societies, cultures, and systems that are much more unjust than ours. This is an untenable step for leftists to take, because it means acknowledging that there is something superior about our civilization that’s worth saving and defending.
The notion that his own society is evil and unjust is the bedrock of the leftist’s vision. Wicked capitalists trample on the poor, the oppressed, and the downtrodden; the leftist appoints himself to rescue these victims.
He is a self-styled social redeemer, leading a movement to liberate the masses, even if it results in the destruction of his own society. This political mission provides him with immense moral indignation and, therefore, moral superiority, dispositions from which, in turn, he derives emotional self-gratification. His whole belief system provides him with a sense of belonging; he joins other social redeemers, as well as the victims, real or imagined, who wait for him to break their chains.
Thus, the leftist’s political disposition is a faith that reinforces his personal identity and sense of belonging. Admitting that Hasan is a jihadist would undermine that faith. It would also expose the leftist to potential excommunication from his social community.
He’d become politically suspect to his peers, perhaps even accused of becoming a reactionary right-winger. That’s why we will continue to witness more Fort Hood denial from the Left, with all of its irrationality and disregard for human life.
To get the whole story on the Left’s Jihad Denial, read Jamie Glazov’s new book, United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror.
Yet the evidence is now conclusive: the Fort Hood massacre was an act of Islamic terror. Before his shooting spree, Hasan told colleagues that non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell and that they should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats.
Hasan traded 18 e-mails with Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaida recruiter. On the morning of the massacre, he gave his neighbor a Koran as he was departing for the base, telling her that he was going to do “good work for God.” Wearing Pakistani garb, Hasan shouted “Allahu akbar” as he began firing at U.S. troops.
Despite the plentiful evidence, however, leftists refuse to accept Hasan’s Islamic inspiration.
We’ve heard the rationalizations: Hasan was a nut; the stresses of serving in the military drove him crazy; he experienced anti-Islamic discrimination; anyone is capable of “losing it” under such stressful conditions; and so on.
These reflexive denials are a logical continuation of the Left’s long tradition of denying the evil of our totalitarian enemies—or, when forced to acknowledge them, blaming them on the United States. This was the pattern throughout the Cold War, and it’s continued during the War on Terror.
When it’s proven beyond reasonable doubt that jihadism was in fact Hasan’s motive, here’s a prediction: leftists will either fall into apathetic silence or respond that it was American racism, oppression, and Islamophobia that forced Hasan’s hand.
To recognize the evil of Nidal Hasan and his ideology, to admit the existence of pernicious enemies, is to concede that there are societies, cultures, and systems that are much more unjust than ours. This is an untenable step for leftists to take, because it means acknowledging that there is something superior about our civilization that’s worth saving and defending.
The notion that his own society is evil and unjust is the bedrock of the leftist’s vision. Wicked capitalists trample on the poor, the oppressed, and the downtrodden; the leftist appoints himself to rescue these victims.
He is a self-styled social redeemer, leading a movement to liberate the masses, even if it results in the destruction of his own society. This political mission provides him with immense moral indignation and, therefore, moral superiority, dispositions from which, in turn, he derives emotional self-gratification. His whole belief system provides him with a sense of belonging; he joins other social redeemers, as well as the victims, real or imagined, who wait for him to break their chains.
Thus, the leftist’s political disposition is a faith that reinforces his personal identity and sense of belonging. Admitting that Hasan is a jihadist would undermine that faith. It would also expose the leftist to potential excommunication from his social community.
He’d become politically suspect to his peers, perhaps even accused of becoming a reactionary right-winger. That’s why we will continue to witness more Fort Hood denial from the Left, with all of its irrationality and disregard for human life.
To get the whole story on the Left’s Jihad Denial, read Jamie Glazov’s new book, United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
The Burqa Barbie
By now everyone has heard of the Burqa Barbie that was brought out by Matell.... I and many others from ACT 4 America had sent them e-mails noting our displeasure with that doll. Here is their response to my e-mail:
From: FP Consumer Affairs (CATS) FPConsumerAffairsCATS@Fisher-Price.com
Subject: In Reference to Case Number: 17530577
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 5:25 PM
In Reference to Case Number: 17530577
Thank you for contacting us. We appreciate the opportunity to respond. In this case, Italian artist and designer Eliana Lorena used Barbie as a model to showcase her interpretation of cultural dress from around the world. Barbie was literally her canvas and the outfits were the artist's personal expression. This was one of the 500 different Barbie dolls representing 500 different cultures that were auctioned at a charity event. Barbie has no religious affiliation and we have no plans to make commercial editions of the dolls. These dolls are not available for sale.
Sincerely,
Mattel Consumer Relations service.mattel.com
So there you have it. Listen people...if we don't speak up and display our displeasure and in some cases our outrage at things that concern us, we may as well just hand everything over to them. SPEAK UP!! Write those letters!! Remember what Martin Luther King once said: "Speak without fear."
From: FP Consumer Affairs (CATS) FPConsumerAffairsCATS@Fisher-Price.com
Subject: In Reference to Case Number: 17530577
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 5:25 PM
In Reference to Case Number: 17530577
Thank you for contacting us. We appreciate the opportunity to respond. In this case, Italian artist and designer Eliana Lorena used Barbie as a model to showcase her interpretation of cultural dress from around the world. Barbie was literally her canvas and the outfits were the artist's personal expression. This was one of the 500 different Barbie dolls representing 500 different cultures that were auctioned at a charity event. Barbie has no religious affiliation and we have no plans to make commercial editions of the dolls. These dolls are not available for sale.
Sincerely,
Mattel Consumer Relations service.mattel.com
So there you have it. Listen people...if we don't speak up and display our displeasure and in some cases our outrage at things that concern us, we may as well just hand everything over to them. SPEAK UP!! Write those letters!! Remember what Martin Luther King once said: "Speak without fear."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
